DSpace Repository

Некоторые соображения о роли парадокса в научных исследованиях

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Большаков, Владимир Иванович
dc.contributor.author Bolshakov, Vladymyr
dc.contributor.author Дубров, Юрий Исаевич
dc.contributor.author Dubrov, Yurii
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T10:30:51Z
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T10:30:51Z
dc.date.issued 2014-04
dc.identifier http://visnyk.pgasa.dp.ua/article/view/40339
dc.identifier.citation Большаков В. И. Некоторые соображения о роли парадокса в научных исследованиях / В. И. Большаков, Ю. И. Дубров // Вісник Придніпровської державної академії будівництва та архітектури. – 2014 – № 4. – С. 4-10 uk_UA
dc.identifier.uri http://srd.pgasa.dp.ua:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11628
dc.description.abstract RU: Показано, что возникновение парадокса в научных исследованиях часто порождает абсолютно новые решения, часто ошибочно называемые абсурдом. Приведены примеры из области системного анализа. uk_UA
dc.description.abstract EN: It seems to us that the value of any scientific work is not only in the presentation of concrete results, but also to a large extent that it should stimulate further studies in the field of study in her knowledge. However, sometimes in many publications, that devoted to the description and study of special scientific fields, the basic ideas and research results are formalized to the extent that the study of these works, even for well-trained reader, often turns in their transcript. However, science is not only of the concepts, theories and their evidence. It inevitably involves a number of general concepts related to the choice of the subject of research and the formation of concepts needed to conduct these studies. At the same time, a philosophical question inevitably arises: what is the relation of that part of science, we are doing to the real world around us? In this regard, we are trying to answer this question, without claiming to be common, though, much of what we celebrate on this occasion, is not new, and similar ideas can be found in other authors. In my defense, we note that the almost simultaneous occurrence of similar thoughts in different authors, in no way connected with each other, under the current complexity of the world around us, is a known fact. As examples we can point to the discovery of analytic geometry, Descartes and Fermat, the discovery of calculus by Newton and G. V. Leibniz, the discovery of non-Euclidean geometry of N. I. Lobachevsky, J. Bolyai and K. F. Gauss, vector calculus opening H. Grassmann and W. R. Hamilton, etc. And these scientists, in their human qualities different, almost incompatible. Objects of study, general systems theory, in the majority, are objects with a large number of variables, strongly interconnected, part of which is randomly changed (or unpredictable) way. In this context, an adequate description of the tools and studies of such objects is the probability theory, which allows to measure quantitatively the degree of «credibility» (probability) of different events, compare them and numerically evaluate the probability of occurrence of an event, and predicts the probability outcomes of random events.
dc.language.iso ru uk_UA
dc.publisher ДВНЗ «Придніпровська державна академія будівництва та архітектури» uk_UA
dc.subject парадокс uk_UA
dc.subject системный подход uk_UA
dc.subject абсурд uk_UA
dc.subject искусственный интеллект uk_UA
dc.subject artificial intelligence uk_UA
dc.subject systems approach uk_UA
dc.subject absurdity uk_UA
dc.subject paradox uk_UA
dc.title Некоторые соображения о роли парадокса в научных исследованиях uk_UA
dc.title.alternative Some thoughts on the role of paradox in research uk_UA
dc.type Article uk_UA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account