Аналіз цілей сталого розвитку в контексті впровадження міжнародних корпоративних моделей

Abstract

UK: Ціллю статті є аналіз міжнародних корпоративних моделей у відповідності до цілей сталого розвитку і по-дача рекомендацій щодо вибору української моделі стосовно вказаних цілей. Встановлено, що відмінності між цими системами можна побачити в їхніх цільових фокусах. Англо-американська модель орієнтована на фондовий ринок. В німецькій моделі, яку іноді називають континентальною моделлю, або європейською моделлю, основні процедури управління здійснюється двома формалізованими групами: наглядовою радою та виконавчою радою. Японська модель є найбільш сконцентрованою та жорсткою, тоді як англо-американська модель є найбільш дисперсною та гнучкою. В статті зроблено висновок, що для України, на нашу думку, найсприятливою є німецька модель, завдячуючи більш тісним стосункам та географічний близькості. Тому нам необхідно багато характерних позицій втілити і в корпора-тивній діяльності виробничого, фінансового, комерційного секторів нашої країни.

EN: The purpose of the article is to analyze international corporate models in relation to the goals of sustainable development and to provide recommendations on the choice of the Ukrainian model in relation to the specified goals. It has been estab-lished that the differences between these systems can be seen in their target focuses. The Anglo-American model is focused on the stock market. In the German model, which is sometimes called as the continental model or the European model, the main management procedures are carried out by two formalized groups: the supervisory board and the executive board. The Japanese model is the most concentrated and rigid, while the Anglo-American model is the most dispersed and flexible. The Anglo-American model, is also known as the Anglo-Saxon model, was found to have been shaped by the more individualistic business societies in Great Britain and the United States of America. This model is represented by such corporate bodies as the board of directors and shareholders as controlling management bodies. Managers and leaders in the process of organiz-ing management have secondary powers. In the German model, which is sometimes called as the continental model or the European model, the main management procedures are carried out by two formalized groups: the supervisory board and the executive board. The Executive Board is responsible for the quality of decisions in the field of property management. The su-pervisory board controls the executive board. The supervisory board is elected by employees and shareholders. State admin-istration bodies, national interests have a significant influence in the continental management model. Considerable attention is paid to the corporation's responsibility to society and the state. In the continental model, banks also play a large role in the financial plan and in decision-making in the process of the corporation's activities. The Japanese model stands out from the first two. This management model is formed in the light of two dominant legal relationships: one – between shareholders, customers, suppliers, creditors and trade unions; the other is between administrators, managers and shareholders. There is a sense of shared responsibility and balance in the Japanese model. In practice, this balance takes the form of a conservative position and mistrust of management innovations and new business relationships in favor of old ones. The article concludes that, the German model is the most favorable for Ukraine, thanks to closer relations and geographical proximity. Therefore, we need to implement many characteristic positions in the corporate activities of the production, financial, and commercial sectors of our country.